Are Both GOP, DNC, and MSM In On Putting Trump Into The Whitehouse?

March 6, 2016

Donald Trump & Hillary Clinton Royal Presidential Bloodline Cousins?

Donald Trump & Hillary Clinton Royal Presidential Bloodline Cousins? By: Michael D. Tobin March 6, 2016

  Every 4 years as far back as I remember from the Reagan years when I first began following politics when I was 16 years old, mainstream articles pop up reminding us of Presidential royal bloodlines. This story was the last straw for this year's elections candidates:( http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/06/presidential-bloodlines.html ) I've been wondering why I haven't seen anything about Donald Trump's bloodline, so I finally got in gear and did a little search, and came up with the following. As far as this above linked article claiming 'ALL' Presidents, it turns out the second of the articles below put that notion to rest: "...with the exception of Martin Van Buren, all U.S. Commanders in Chief — including current President Barack Obama — were descendants of a medieval English king." - JILIAN FAMA from article, "Outrageously Bizarre Facts about U.S. Presidents" But the Atlantean Conspiracy link above in the parenthesis very specifically mentioned the most royal English AND French bloodlines as well. And that article is from 2013, before Trump was involved as he is now. So What about Van Buren? Was he French? How did he rate to break any pattern? Or he didn't fit the English, but did he in fact fir the French connection? I don't know. Someone else can look that up. But it seems that many have reasons for just why both major sides of the American party system are vehemently against Donald Trump in particular. And that, partly, is what fueled my interest to check if Trump is actually "one of the guys." According to others' researches, it appears he is a sibling of sorts. So why all the malice and slander? I'll leave that to other writers as well. And you can see the articles below, which explain Trump and Hillary's blood relations.

But, the same people who brought you Desert Storm, the towers demolitions and beheaded Christians are the same

one's putting Trump into the Whitehouse. They are doing this by making us believe justice will be done by 

overriding Obama's actions. The GOP opposition to Trump is a ruse to shift the heat onto one person so after the 

dirty work is done, the GOP as a whole, can claim political races as usual, being able to say they've tried to warn us.

  In other words, maybe all the opposition to Trump is really reverse psychology and all the strategy and math is 

being played out very precisely to where the numbers will create yet another win for world elite. My basis for my

thoughts is simply who the 2nd contender is: Ted Cruz. He is closest in his Christian theological beliefs to most 

American Christians, except for his dominionist leanings, and why would any political or mainstream media be 

pushing for someone of his personal beliefs? Hillary and Sanders align more with mainstream media, and Hillary 

aligns more with both sides of political establishment. And just about everything Trump stands for is against 

mainstream media AND both sides of political establishment, but why would political establishment reverse 

psychologically push for Trump, who claims so much opposition to recent leanings of their practices? 

  As I said above, I believe it's necessary to the GOP and DNC who are controlled by global political elite to now, 

attempt to  repair all the damage from Desert storm up until current unrest all over Europe, North Africa and the 

Middle East, and somehow create an illusion of unity in our own nation. And I'll add that every honest-thinking 

American should know and admit that Obama never belonged in the Whitehouse legally, and mainstream media and

 our political establishment are in the position to where they need to make amends for their doings, which is them 

manipulating Obama into the Whitehouse in the first place, and even two consecutive terms, to create and fulfil a 

litany of global interests which most are in opposition to our founding documents, checks and balances.And Trump

is the "go-to guy", or the "fall-guy", and Hillary will be knocked out based on her crooked lifetime of lies, mistakes 

and disregard, all the while keeping to ancient traditions of keeping royal blood in the Whitehouse. And Hillary can

say, "at least he's related to me, and one of us had to make it." 

And ultimately, as others who have written books, blogs and articles on, the whole litany those who broke our laws 

and violated our  Constitution, such as Obama, Hillary and many others, will be dealt with, and so many who are 

above the majority of our pay-grades are screaming for prison terms, will get their way, in the guise of standing for 

the demands of we the people.

Some more of my own closing thoughts are, this all really seems very contradictory, because we should be 

wanting someone unrelated to royalty, but Trump is saying all the right things. So he's either truthful or he's lying. 

The great majority of GOP, independent and Democrats supporting him are betting he's telling the truth. And that's 

the only way, this election, yet another out of every President who have had royal blood, to get another royal 

bloodline candidate as President. For the first time in anyone who's alive, a royal candidate is actually against what 

they've been in favor of for over 100 years since banks have taken over our Constitution and country. This is huge 

and above all of our paygrades whatever is really happening.

It Turns out Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Are Distant Cousins

John Vibes
September 3, 2015

http://theantimedia.org/it-turns-out-hillary-clinton-and-donald-trump-are-distant-cousins/

(ANTIMEDIA) Author A.J. Jacobs and a team of researchers with genealogy web sites myheritage.com and geni.com have recently developed a family tree showing that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are distant cousins. They share royal blood that runs deep in their family lines.

Jacobs told Extra in a recent interview that “Their 19th great grandfather is King Edward III so there is precedent for ruling a country, it’s in their genes.”

The family tree, which can be seen and verified below (courtesy of myheritage.com/geni.com), is comprised of a long line of aristocracy on both ends.

When you take a close look at how global events have progressed over the ages, you will find that many of the families who dominate politics and economics today have bloodlines that trace back to the feudal lords of the Middle Ages. In Middle Eastern and third world countries, this is painfully obvious because there are still royal dynasties that openly claim it is their birthright to rule over their country. While in the West the aristocrats are a bit less open, the same principle still applies.

For example, according to British genealogy researchers Burkes 

Peerage, most of the presidents in American history have been connected to a select few royal bloodlines.

In the election of 2004, George Bush and John Kerry were the options for U.S. president, but both candidates were distant cousins to the Queen of England. They even belonged to the same secret society at Yale University, the morbidly named Skull and Bones fraternity.

A young girl recently made the royal connections famous when her science fair project concluded that with the exception of Martin Van Buren, all U.S. Commanders in Chief — including current President Barack Obama — were descendants of a medieval English king.

---

This article (It Turns out Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Are Distant Cousins ) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to John Vibes and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, emailedits@theantimedia.org.

Outrageously Bizarre Facts about U.S. Presidents

By JILIAN FAMA

Aug. 8, 2012     

Bush, Kerry, and Hefner All Distant Cousins http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/ten-outrageously-bizarre-facts-us-presidents/story?id=16948401 (Following is an excerpt from this article. Clik above link for complete article)

Extremely coincidentally, President George W. Bush and Sen. John Kerry are very distantly related. They are ninth cousins, twice removed. The two politically astute and well educated men may have different political ideologies, but their love for their country and politics sheds light on a cousinly bond.

But they have another mutually distant cousin who doesn't quite fit that mould.

Playboy founder Hugh Hefner is the ninth cousin of both men. Hef is twice removed from George W., and Hefner is a slightly closer relation to Kerry, being only once removed.

When asked about his relation to the two politicians, wild child Heffner said, "Well I feel closer to Senator Kerry."

"You know I'm an 11th generation direct descendent of William Bradford, who came over on the Mayflower, a direct descendent of a Puritan," Hefner continued proudly, finding no irony in the fact. "I suppose that it is not a big surprise, but it is certainly unique to be a relation to both candidates."

"I would be delighted to invite both President Bush and Senator Kerry for a family reunion," the playboy added facetiously, laughing to himself.

MAR 7, 2016 @ 06:25 AM Forbes

Oil Prices Should Fall, Possibly Hard

Art Berman

CONTRIBUTOR

http://www.forbes.com/sites/arthurberman/2016/03/07/oil-prices-should-fall-possibly-hard/?utm_campaign=Forbes&utm_source=FBPAGE&utm_medium=social&utm_channel=Business&linkId=22127538#2b461203433a

Oil prices should fall, possibly hard, in coming weeks. That is because fundamentals do not support the present price.

Prices should fall to around $30 once the empty nature of an OPEC-plus-Russia production freeze is understood. A return to the grim reality of over-supply and the weakness of the world economy could push prices well into the $20s.

A Production Freeze Will Not Reduce The Supply Surplus

An OPEC-plus-Russia production cut would be a great step toward re-establishing oil-market balance. I believe that will happen later in 2016 but is not on the table today.

In late February, Saudi oil minister Ali Al-Naimi stated categorically, “There is no sense in wasting our time in seeking production cuts. That will not happen.”

Instead, Russia and Saudi Arabia have apparently agreed to a production freeze. This is meaningless theater but it helped lift oil prices 37% from just more than $26 in mid-February to almost $36 per barrel last week. That is a lot of added revenue for Saudi Arabia and Russia but it will do nothing to balance the over-supplied world oil market.

The problem is that neither Saudi Arabia nor Russia has greatly increased production since the oil-price collapse began in 2014 (Figure 1). A freeze by those countries, therefore, will only ensure that the supply surplus will not get worse because of them. It is, moreover, doubtful that Saudi Arabia or Russia have the spare capacity to increase production much beyond present levels making the proposal of a freeze cynical rather than helpful.

Figure 1. Incremental liquids production since January 2014 by the United States plus Canada, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Russia. Source: EIA & Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (click image to enlarge)

Saudi Arabia and Russia are two of the world’s largest oil-producing countries. Yet in January 2016, Saudi liquids output was only ~110,000 bpd more than in January 2014 and Russia was actually producing~50,000 bpd less than in January 2014. The present world production surplus is more than 2 mmbpd.

By contrast, the U.S. plus Canada are producing ~1.9 mmbpd more than in January 2014 and Iraq’s crude oil production has increased~1.7 mmbpd. Also, Iran has potential to increase its production by as much as ~1 mmbpd during 2016. Yet, none of these countries have agreed to the production freeze. Iran, in fact, called the idea “ridiculous.”

Growing Storage Means Lower Oil Prices

U.S. crude oil stocks increased by a remarkable 10.4 mmb in the week ending February 26, the largest addition since early April 2015. That brought inventories to an astonishing 162 mmb more than the 2010-2014 average and 74 mmb above the bloated levels of 2015 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. U.S. crude oil stocks. Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (click image to enlarge)

The correlation between U.S. crude oil stocks and world oil prices is strong. Tank farms at Cushing, Oklahoma (PADD 2) and storage facilities in the Gulf Coast region (PADD 3) account for almost 70% of total U.S. storage and are critical in WTI price formation. When storage exceeds about 80% of capacity, oil prices generally fall hard. Current Cushing storage is at 91% of capacity, the Gulf Coast is at 87% and combined, they are at a whopping 88% of capacity (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Cushing and Gulf Coast crude oil storage. Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (click image to enlarge)

Prices have fallen hard in step with growing storage throughout 2015 and early 2016. Since talk of a production freeze first surfaced, however, intoxicated investors have ignored storage builds and traders are testing new thresholds before they fall again.

The truth is that prices will not increase sustainably until storage volumes fall, and that cannot happen until U.S. production declines by about 1 mmbpd.

Despite extreme reductions in rig count and catastrophic financial losses by E&P companies, production decline has been painfully slow. The latest data from EIA indicates that February 2016 production will fall approximately 100,000 bpd compared to January (Figure 4).

Figure 4. U.S. crude oil production and forecast. Source: EIA STEO, EIA This Week In Petroleum, and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (click image to enlarge)

That is an improvement over the average 60,000 bpd monthly decline since the April 2015 peak.  It is not enough, however, to make a difference in storage and storage controls price.

EIA and IEA will publish updates this week on the world oil market balance and I doubt that the news will be very good. IEA indicated last month that the world over-supply had increased almost 750,000 bpd in the 4th quarter of 2015 compared with the previous quarter. EIA data corroborated those findings and showed that the surplus in January 2016 had increased 650,000 bpd from December 2015.

Oil Prices and The Value of the Dollar

Why, then, have oil prices increased? Partly, it is because of hope for an OPEC production freeze and that sentiment is expressed in the OVX crude oil-price volatility index (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Crude oil volatility index (OVX) and WTI price. Source: EIA, CBOE and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (click image to enlarge)

The OVX reflects how investors feel about where oil prices are going. It is sometimes called the “fear index.” That suggests that investors are feeling pretty good and less fearful about the oil markets than in the last quarter of 2015 when oil prices fell 47%. Since mid-February, prices have increased 37%.

But there is more to it than just hope and that may be found in the strength of the U.S. dollar. The negative correlation between the value of the dollar and world oil prices is well-established. The oil-price increase in February was accompanied by a decrease in the trade-weighted value of the dollar (Figure 6).

Figure 6. U.S. Dollar value vs. WTI NYMEX futures price. Source: EIA, U.S. Federal Reserve Bank and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (click to enlarge)

Now, that trend has reversed. The U.S. jobs report last week was positive so continued strength of the dollar is reasonable for awhile. Assuming the usual correlation, that means that oil prices should fall.

 Oil Prices Should Fall Hard

It is a sign of how bad things have gotten in oil markets that we feel optimistic about $35 oil prices. It should also be a warning that the over-supply that got us here has not gone away.

Oil storage volumes continue to grow and that is the surest indication that production has not declined enough yet to make a difference. It is impossible to imagine oil prices rising much beyond present levels until storage starts to fall. In fact, it is difficult to understand $35 per barrel prices based on any measure of oil-market fundamentals.

The OPEC-plus-Russia production freeze is a cynical joke designed to increase their short-term revenues without doing anything about production levels. An output cut would make a difference but a freeze on current Saudi and Russian production levels means nothing.  It apparently made some investors feel better but it didn’t do anything for me. Iran got this one right by calling it ridiculous.

No terrible economic news has surfaced in recent weeks but that does not change the profound weakness of a global economy that is burdened with debt and weak demand. The announcement last week by the People’s Bank of China that it sees room for more quantitative easing may have comforted stock markets but it only added to my anxiety about reduced oil consumption and future downward shocks in oil prices.

I hope that oil prices increase but cannot find any substantive reason why they should do anything but fall. As market balance reality re-emerges in investor consciousness and the false euphoria of a production freeze recedes, prices should correct to around $30. A little bad economic or political news could send prices much lower.

I have no short positions in oil or in any other investments. 

Art Berman
Petroleum Geologist and Professional Speaker
Visit my website for more information: artberman.com